Friday, March 02, 2007
3/2 SNR II : Denied
New on Pacer: ORDER DENYING SCO’S MOTION FOR RELIEF RE SPOLIATION (IBM-973).
It's a very brief doc, which reads:
Nelson: "Ha, ha!".
I seem to be quoting Nelson a lot lately.
Updated: It's on GL now, along with some scheduling minutiae in the the NOVL case. People who are more cynical and conspiracy-minded than I might note that deposition deadline and start planning a "Welcome Back PJ" party for April 1st.
It's a very brief doc, which reads:
Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant The SCO Group, Inc.’s (“SCO’s”) Motion for Relief for IBM’s Spoliation of Evidence came before the Court for hearing on January 18, 2007. Mark James appeared for SCO. Todd Shaughnessy appeared for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”). The Court, having considered both parties’ papers, having heard argument of counsel, and for good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SCO’s motion is denied for the reasons set forth by the Court at the hearing held on January 18, 2007.
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2007.
BY THE COURT
____________________________
Brooke C. Wells Magistrate Judge
Nelson: "Ha, ha!".
I seem to be quoting Nelson a lot lately.
Updated: It's on GL now, along with some scheduling minutiae in the the NOVL case. People who are more cynical and conspiracy-minded than I might note that deposition deadline and start planning a "Welcome Back PJ" party for April 1st.
Labels: linux, open source, sco, tech
By brx0 @ 11:50 AM 
